<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>ATR on Korea Invest Insights</title><link>https://koreainvestinsights.com/tags/atr/</link><description>Recent content in ATR on Korea Invest Insights</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 02:43:23 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://koreainvestinsights.com/tags/atr/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>KOSPI 60-Day Disparity At +28.6%: Not A Top Call, But A Partial Risk-Reduction Signal</title><link>https://koreainvestinsights.com/post/kospi-disparity60-overheat-framework-partial-trim-2026-06-21/</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 02:35:00 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://koreainvestinsights.com/post/kospi-disparity60-overheat-framework-partial-trim-2026-06-21/</guid><description>
 &lt;blockquote&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;Context
This is a follow-up to &lt;a class="link" href="https://koreainvestinsights.com/post/kospi-benchmark-hard-to-beat-narrow-market-monte-carlo-2026-06-20/" &gt;How Rare Is It To Beat The Pure KOSPI Benchmark?&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="link" href="https://koreainvestinsights.com/post/korea-etf-flow-led-market-volatility-strategy-2026-06-13/" &gt;ETF Flow Is Leading The Korean Market&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="link" href="https://koreainvestinsights.com/post/korea-market-liquidity-foreign-reallocation-adr-narrow-leadership-2026-06-03/" &gt;Korea Has Liquidity, But Breadth Has Broken&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a class="link" href="https://koreainvestinsights.com/post/foreign-return-after-24-day-kospi-selling-memory-rebalance-2026-06-12/" &gt;Have Foreign Investors Returned?&lt;/a&gt;. Related hubs: &lt;a class="link" href="https://koreainvestinsights.com/page/exclusive-analysis-hub/" &gt;Exclusive Analysis&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a class="link" href="https://koreainvestinsights.com/page/korea-daily-market-hub/" &gt;Korea Daily Market Hub&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

 &lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;h2 id="tldr"&gt;TL;DR
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;As of June 19, 2026, KOSPI closed at &lt;strong&gt;9,052&lt;/strong&gt;, its 60-day moving average was &lt;strong&gt;7,039&lt;/strong&gt;, and its 60-day disparity was &lt;strong&gt;+28.6%&lt;/strong&gt;. That is clear medium-term overspeed.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;But disparity overheat is not automatically a market top. Reproducing 355 trading days from January 2, 2025 to June 19, 2026 shows that 20/60/120-day overheat signals were followed by positive average 5-day and 20-day returns. In a strong trend, overheat can first mean acceleration.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;However, when 60-day disparity rises above +20%, the probability of a -5% drawdown within the next 10 trading days rises from a 16% baseline to &lt;strong&gt;63%&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;That 63% must be handled carefully. The 41 signal days are not 41 independent observations. They compress into &lt;strong&gt;8 episodes&lt;/strong&gt;, and only 6 had completed forward windows.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The current read is therefore: &lt;strong&gt;partial risk reduction is justified, but this is not a top call.&lt;/strong&gt; Disparity and volatility gates are on; the 20-day moving-average slope is still rising.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;div class="thesis-callout"&gt;
 &lt;div class="thesis-callout__label"&gt;Core Point&lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;div class="thesis-callout__body"&gt;
 KOSPI's +28.6% 60-day disparity does not say &lt;strong&gt;"this is the top"&lt;/strong&gt;. It says &lt;strong&gt;the trend has become fast enough that investors should reduce chase risk, harvest part of the risk budget, and prepare for a pullback window&lt;/strong&gt;.
 &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;h2 id="1-what-was-tested"&gt;1. What was tested
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;The analysis independently reproduced a KOSPI disparity framework. The questions were:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Do the current KOSPI disparity numbers tie out?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Did disparity overheat historically raise correction probability?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Should the current reading be treated as a sell signal?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
 &lt;thead&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Item&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Setting&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/thead&gt;
 &lt;tbody&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Index&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;KOSPI, &lt;code&gt;^KS11&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Period&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;2025-01-02 to 2026-06-19&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Sample&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;355 trading days&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Price&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Close&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Disparity&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;&lt;code&gt;close / N-day moving average - 1&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Windows&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;20, 60, 120 days&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Correction definition&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;A -5% or worse low within the next 10 trading days&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Baseline&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Same correction frequency across all valid days&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a market-risk framework, not a trading instruction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="2-current-state-the-core-numbers-tie-out"&gt;2. Current state: the core numbers tie out
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;table&gt;
 &lt;thead&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Metric&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th style="text-align: right"&gt;Original&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th style="text-align: right"&gt;Reproduction&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Read&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/thead&gt;
 &lt;tbody&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;KOSPI close&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;9,052&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;9,052&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Matched&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;MA20 / disparity20&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;8,322 / +8.8%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;8,322 / +8.77%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Matched&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;MA60 / disparity60&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;7,039 / +28.6%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;7,039 / +28.61%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Matched&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;MA120 / disparity120&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;6,088 / +48.7%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;6,088 / +48.69%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Matched&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;MA20 5-day slope&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+4.25%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;+4.25%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Matched&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;RSI(14)&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;57&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SMA 57.3 / Wilder 65.9&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Formula difference&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;ATR(20)%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;3.61%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Wilder 4.15 / SMA 4.70&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Formula difference&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The key moving-average and disparity numbers tie out almost exactly. The RSI difference is explainable by formula choice: SMA RSI is close to 57, while Wilder RSI is 65.9. Both remain below 70. The conclusion is unchanged: this is not primarily an RSI overbought signal. It is a medium-term disparity signal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="3-overheat-did-not-predict-tops-well"&gt;3. Overheat did not predict tops well
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;table&gt;
 &lt;thead&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Signal&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th style="text-align: right"&gt;Signal days&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th style="text-align: right"&gt;Avg +5D return&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th style="text-align: right"&gt;Avg +20D return&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th style="text-align: right"&gt;Negative +20D share&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/thead&gt;
 &lt;tbody&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Disparity20 ≥ 7%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;74&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+2.68%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+9.07%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;24%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Disparity60 ≥ 12%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;120&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+2.26%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+6.88%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;22%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Disparity120 ≥ 20%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;107&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+2.55%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+9.11%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;23%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Baseline&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;335&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+1.86%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+7.83%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;19%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is the first uncomfortable point. In this 2025-2026 trend, overheat did not reliably identify the top. Average returns after overheat signals were still positive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That makes sense in a strong trend. A large distance above moving averages often means money is still being forced into the leaders.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="4-but-60-day-disparity-did-raise-pullback-odds"&gt;4. But 60-day disparity did raise pullback odds
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;table&gt;
 &lt;thead&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Condition&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th style="text-align: right"&gt;Signal days&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th style="text-align: right"&gt;-5% correction within 10 trading days&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/thead&gt;
 &lt;tbody&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Baseline&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;All valid days&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;16%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Disparity60 ≥ 15%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;89&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;36%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Disparity60 ≥ 18%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;54&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;48%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Disparity60 ≥ 20%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;41&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;63%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Disparity60 ≥ 22%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;33&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;67%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Disparity60 ≥ 25%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;26&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;65%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The signal is useful, but not as a top-calling tool. It is a pullback-risk warning. Above +20% disparity60, the probability of a -5% drawdown within 10 trading days rose about fourfold versus the baseline.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="5-the-statistical-caveat-41-days-are-only-8-episodes"&gt;5. The statistical caveat: 41 days are only 8 episodes
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;The 41 days of +20% disparity are not independent. Grouped into runs, they become 8 episodes:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
 &lt;thead&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;th style="text-align: right"&gt;#&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Episode&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th style="text-align: right"&gt;Signal days&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th style="text-align: right"&gt;Peak disparity60&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;-5% correction within 10D&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/thead&gt;
 &lt;tbody&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;1&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;2025-11-03&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;1&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+22.3%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Yes&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;2026-01-28 to 01-30&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;3&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+21.6%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Yes&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;3&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;2026-02-03 to 02-04&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+22.8%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Yes&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;4&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;2026-02-12 to 03-03&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;10&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+33.6%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Yes&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;5&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;2026-05-04 to 05-18&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;10&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+32.1%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Yes&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;6&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;2026-05-21 to 06-05&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;10&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+36.6%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Yes&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;7&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;2026-06-09&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;1&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+21.6%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Not complete&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;8&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;2026-06-15 to 06-18&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;4&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+29.9%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Not complete&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The six completed episodes all produced a -5% correction. That is strong, but the sample is tiny. The right lesson is not to hard-code exact thresholds. The right lesson is to treat extreme 60-day disparity as a risk-budget tightening signal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="6-which-indicators-mattered"&gt;6. Which indicators mattered?
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;table&gt;
 &lt;thead&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Indicator&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th style="text-align: right"&gt;Pre-correction average&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th style="text-align: right"&gt;Full-sample average&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th style="text-align: right"&gt;Difference&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Signal quality&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/thead&gt;
 &lt;tbody&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Disparity60&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+20.35&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+11.33&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+9.02&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Strong&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;ATR%(Wilder)&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+2.56&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+2.03&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+0.53&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Medium to strong&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;MA20 slope&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+2.74&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+1.81&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+0.93&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Medium&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Disparity20&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+5.06&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+3.50&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+1.56&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Weak&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;RSI(Wilder)&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+64.53&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;+65.46&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;-0.93&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Little signal&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ranking is intuitive. A 20-day average follows price quickly, so it gets digested fast. A 60-day average moves more slowly, so extreme 60-day disparity captures medium-term overspeed better. RSI was not the useful axis in this sample.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="7-the-current-three-gate-read"&gt;7. The current three-gate read
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;table&gt;
 &lt;thead&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Gate&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Rule&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th style="text-align: right"&gt;Current value&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Status&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/thead&gt;
 &lt;tbody&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Medium-term overspeed&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Disparity60 ≥ 18-20%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;+28.6%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;On&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Volatility expansion&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;ATR ≥ 2.2%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;4% range&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;On&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Trend deterioration&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;MA20 slope slowing or turning down&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;+4.25% rising&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Not yet&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two gates are on. That argues against aggressive chasing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the third gate is not on. The 20-day moving-average slope is still rising. Therefore the current signal is not a broad-market exit signal. It is a partial rebalancing signal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="8-use-dynamic-levels-not-fixed-index-levels"&gt;8. Use dynamic levels, not fixed index levels
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;One common mistake is to hard-code an index level. If the 60-day moving average is 7,039 and the re-entry zone is roughly 8% above it, investors may anchor on something like KOSPI 7,600.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But moving averages move. In a strong trend, the 60-day average will keep rising.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="highlight"&gt;&lt;pre tabindex="0" style="color:#f8f8f2;background-color:#272822;-moz-tab-size:4;-o-tab-size:4;tab-size:4;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;"&gt;&lt;code class="language-text" data-lang="text"&gt;&lt;span style="display:flex;"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Static frame: KOSPI around 7,600
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="display:flex;"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Dynamic frame: the then-current 60-day moving average plus roughly 8%
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;The dynamic frame is better because the pullback zone moves up as the trend matures.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="9-why-this-matters-more-in-a-narrow-market"&gt;9. Why this matters more in a narrow market
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;The current KOSPI overheat is not a broad-market overheat. It is heavily influenced by Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That links directly to the &lt;a class="link" href="https://koreainvestinsights.com/post/kospi-benchmark-hard-to-beat-narrow-market-monte-carlo-2026-06-20/" &gt;pure KOSPI benchmark analysis&lt;/a&gt;. In 2026, KOSPI has behaved less like the average Korean stock and more like a concentrated AI-memory benchmark.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So the next useful test is not just KOSPI disparity. It is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
 &lt;thead&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Question&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Why it matters&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/thead&gt;
 &lt;tbody&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Is KOSPI overheated?&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Index-level risk budget&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Is KOSPI ex Samsung/SK Hynix overheated?&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Broad-market versus mega-cap effect&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Are memory mega-caps driving the signal?&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Whether the signal is narrow leadership&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Are second-line stocks also stretched?&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Whether this is a broad extension&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;h2 id="10-practical-usage"&gt;10. Practical usage
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;table&gt;
 &lt;thead&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Situation&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Read&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Action frame&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/thead&gt;
 &lt;tbody&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Disparity60 12-18%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Strong trend&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Hold and verify trend&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Disparity60 18-20%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Medium-term overspeed&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Reduce new chase risk&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Disparity60 20%+ with high ATR&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Pullback probability rising&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Reduce part of risk budget&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Disparity60 20%+ and MA20 slope slows&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Distribution risk rising&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Consider further reduction&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Disparity60 cools to 8-12%&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Overheat easing&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Re-underwrite with flow and earnings&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Break below the 60-day average&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Different regime&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Stop using simple pullback-buy rules&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The one-line rule: &lt;strong&gt;60-day disparity overheat is not a short signal. It is a rebalancing signal inside a strong trend.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="final-view"&gt;Final view
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;KOSPI&amp;rsquo;s +28.6% 60-day disparity is real overheat. But the reproduced data does not support treating it as a confirmed top.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overheat signals were followed by positive average returns in this trend. At the same time, +20% or greater 60-day disparity materially raised the odds of a -5% pullback within 10 trading days.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The right conclusion is balanced:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;This is not the zone to abandon the bull market. It is the zone to stop chasing, harvest part of the risk budget, and wait for either trend deterioration or a cleaner pullback.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="coverage-health"&gt;Coverage Health
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;As of: June 19, 2026 close.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Data: KOSPI &lt;code&gt;^KS11&lt;/code&gt;, 2025-01-02 to 2026-06-19, 355 trading days.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Reproduced: 20/60/120-day disparity, RSI 14, ATR 20%, 5-day slope of the 20-day moving average, and -5% forward-10D correction events.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Confirmed: current disparity values, post-overheat forward returns, disparity60 threshold correction rates, RSI formula difference.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Not yet confirmed: 2020-2022 cross-validation, KOSPI ex Samsung Electronics/SK Hynix disparity, and robustness of re-entry rules in a true bear-market transition.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;This is a market-risk framework, not investment advice.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>